Lectavi Draft

Where we stand on academic integrity

This one is a position, not a contract. It is the document to point a university at when they ask what Lectavi is, and the test we hold our own roadmap to. The legally operative version of some of this is in the Terms of Service.

Lectavi is a note taking tool for lectures you attended. The test we apply to every feature is simple: could a student show this to their professor without a problem?

What Lectavi is for

What Lectavi is not for

Why we are saying this out loud

A study tool's distribution runs through the institutions it is used in. Professors recommend things to a hundred students at once, departments approve tools for accommodation use, and universities ban applications by name. A product that markets itself on beating that system is making a short trade, and it is not the trade we want.

It also matters for a plainer reason. The feature we are proudest of is that a wrong answer can play you the eleven seconds where your lecturer explained the thing. That only has any value if you were in the room.

What we ask of you

Follow your institution's rules, which are stricter than ours in places and are the ones you will be held to. If your course says no recording, do not record. If it says AI generated work is not acceptable, do not submit any.

For staff and institutions

If you are a lecturer or an academic integrity officer and something here is unclear, or you believe Lectavi is being used against your policies, write to the support address on the Lectavi site. We would rather hear from you than read about it.